Tag Archives: curcon

2025 Oscars – Musings and Predictions

With the 97th Academy Awards coming up on March 2nd, I decided to get in on the discourse and share my predictions for the awards alongside my general thoughts and musings on the nature of the candidates and appreciation for those artists who were not given the recognition I feel they should have been. I’m less interested in “snubs” and more interested in shining a light on work I felt was spectacular, so my notation of noticeable omissions isn’t meant to denigrate any of other nominees as much as it is to praise what I think is cinematically wonderful/artistically exceptional and offer a look into my own perspective.

For those looking to quickly parse the discussion for just the predictions, I have the winners BOLDED under each award category.

For any category where I haven’t seen a particular nominee, I will be marking them with an * next to the name of the respective film.

I will be skipping the following categories due to lack of familiarity with a majority of the nominees: Animated Short Film, Documentary Short Film, Documentary Feature Film, Live Action Short Film.

BEST PICTURE

FILMDIRECTORPRODUCER(S)
AnoraSean BakerAlex Coco, Samantha Quan, and Sean Baker
The BrutalistBrady CorbetNick Gordon, Brian Young, Andrew Morrison, D.J. Gugenheim, and Brady Corbet
A Complete UnknownJames MangoldFred Berger, James Mangold, and Alex Heineman
ConclaveEdward BergerTessa Ross, Juliette Howell, and Michael A. Jackman
Dune: Part TwoDenis VilleneuveMary Parent, Cale Boyter, Tanya Lapointe, and Denis Villeneuve
Emilia PérezJacques AudiardPascal Caucheteux and Jacques Audiard
I’m Still HereWalter SallesMaria Carlota Bruno and Rodrigo Teixeira
Nickel BoysRaMell RossDede Gardner, Jeremy Kleiner, and Joslyn Barnes
The SubstanceCoralie FargeatCoralie Fargeat, Tim Bevan, and Eric Fellner
WickedJon M. ChuMarc Platt

This year’s Best Picture nominees, from my perspective at least, feel like they’re split into three categories:

1-Ambitious in form and style with muscular filmmaking, utilizing writing and acting in service of the more technical elements to generate transcendent cinematic moments

2-Ambitious in terms of dramaturgy, with a focus on writing and acting wherein the other grandiose aspects of filmmaking are utilized in a subtler fashion to support the formal undercurrents of the writing

3-Heavily reliant on writing and acting to generate moments of poignant catharsis with less focus on the pushing the envelope of visual style or form.

This is not to say films in first group have worse scripts and/or poorer performances while films in the latte two group have nothing technically inventive to marvel at but merely serves as an internal schema I’ve adopted to partition the nominees into more discrete entities for the sake of discussion.

This first group is the one I prefer due to my own leanings and thoughts on what makes for “great” cinema and it consists of: The Brutalist, Dune: Part Two, Nickel Boys, The Substance. I would be happy with any of these films winning the prestigious Best Picture award.

The second group is one I appreciate even if I think the films are a half-step below the aforementioned. This group consists of: Anora, A Complete Unknown, Conclave

The third group consists of: Emilia Pérez, I’m Still Here, Wicked. Although some of these films seem to toe the line and could belong to the second group, I feel comfortable including them here.

Out of all the candidates, the film I believe is MOST LIKELY to win is Sean Baker’s Anora . The film’s great accomplishment is the manner in which it hides the subtlety of its titular character study beneath the veneer of a screw-ball rom-com which slowly fades away to a truly poignant ending. The film strikes the balance between popular appeal and indie endearment makes it feel like a more likely winner than any of the other candidates, but do not be surprised if another winner walks out with the prestigious award.

While I don’t think any film was “snubbed” so to speak, there are a few films which I felt exhibited the best aspects of cinema which I would have thoroughly enjoyed to see nominated, including but not limited to: Robert Egger’s Nosferatu, Jane Schoenbrun’s I Saw the TV Glow, George Miller’s Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Luca Guadagnino’s Queer and Challengers, Paul Schrader’s Oh, Canada.

While some of these films would definitely not see an academy nomination due to their content, experimental tendencies, or genre leanings, I do believe they represent some of the very best of the year and wanted to shine a light on them alongside the aforementioned offerings.

DIRECTING

FILMDIRECTOR
AnoraSean Baker
The BrutalistBrady Corbet
A Complete UnknownJames Mangold
Emilia PérezJacques Audiard
The SubstanceCoralie Fargeat

Out of the directing candidates, I think Sean Baker, Brady Corbet, or Coralie Fargeat winning would be wonderful.

I think that the MOST LIKELY winner will be Brady Corbet.
The sheer expanse of The Brutalist and what Corbet and his crew were able to accomplish feel like they’re too big for voters to ignore and it feels like this may be the “bone” given to the film for its efforts.

In terms of missing directors, the omission of Denis Villenueve is a glaring one but it makes sense given the seemingly general lack of award praise for Dune: Part Two in general at these Oscars. Still, for a film to be nominated for Best Film, Best Sound, Best Production Design, Best Cinematography, and Best Visual Effects to not be nominated for Best Director is perplexing. If the award is meant to recognize the director who put the relevant elements together, and those elements are recognized as excellent in their own right and cohesive enough to generate a picture worth nominating, it feels odd to not include that same director in this set of awards.

INTERNATIONAL FEATURE FILM

FILMDIRECTORCOUNTRY
Emilia PérezJacques AudiardFrance
FlowGints ZilbalodisLatvia
The Girl with the NeedleMagnus von HornDemark
I’m Still HereWalter SallesBrazil
The Seed of the Sacred FigMohammad RasoulofGermany

I believe that Emilia Pérez is MOST LIKELY to win. Even with recent controversy, I believe the film still has the momentum to pick up the award. It’s go-for-broke vision and kinetic energy should be able to keep supporters in tow even if they aren’t fans of the behind-the-scenes drama.

Yet, this category is more interesting to discuss given what is not nominated.

India’s astoundingly poor decision to not nominate All We Imagine as Light by Payal Kapadia should be noted here. If the Cannes Grand Prix winner was on the list of nominees, I’m certain it would have won this award and most likely been nominated for Best Picture.

In addition, seeing The Girl With the Needle amongst the nominees (my pick for best film amongst the bunch) reminds me of the omission of Rahul Sadasivan’s Bramayugam, an equally competent folk-horror bathed in black-and-white which warrants a mention due to its quality.

Of films which were submitted as their countries best, it is Norway’s entry, Armand by Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel, which is noticeably not present. The film, which experiments with the boundaries of a chamber-drama, is gripping, existential and features a knock-out performance by Renate Reinsve.

But on a positive note, it is wonderful to see Flow nominated. It is rare to see an animated picture, even one with a robust cinematic quality, make it out of the Animated only awards and be recognized as cinema proper. One can only hope this is the start of a larger trend recognizing animated films as films that are animated instead of a wholly distinct category.

ANIMATED FEATURE FILM

FILMDIRECTOR(S)
FlowGints Zilbalodis
Inside Out 2Kelsey Mann
Memoir of a SnailAdam Elliot
Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most FowlNick Park, Merlin Crossingham
The Wild RobotChris Sanders

Flow is MOST LIKELY to win. Its presence in the best International Films category makes this all but certain, and it is certainly a worthy winner of the prize. The manner in which it plays with scenarios that coalesce into something grander befitting what we could call “epic” is inspiring and something that cineastes need to experience.

While the other nominees range from “good” to “great”, there’s a dearth of qualified nominees which should’ve been present. As is custom with the Oscars, these are animated films from Japan. These omissions include Naoko Yamada’s The Colors Within and Kiyotaka Oshiyama’s Look Back. Both films feature stellar animation like the nominees, but experiment formally with the medium in ways that deserve recognition outside of just presenting a “great story.”

FILM EDITING

FILMEDITOR
AnoraSean Baker
The BrutalistDávid Jancsó
ConclaveNick Emerson
Emilia PérezJuliette Welfling
WickedMyron Kerstein

While I prefer the structure and methodical pacing of The Brutalist’s editing and would easily give Jancsó the award, I believe the MOST LIKELY to win will be Nick Emerson for his work on Conclave. His editing helps propel the the urgency embedded within the narrative and is apparent especially due to the manner in which the edit unfolds alongside the intense, cutting score.

Yet, this category is less clear cut and I would not be surprised to see Baker or Jancsó taking the award home.

In terms of omissions, Joe Walker’s work on Dune: Part Two and Marco Costa’s work on Challengers are most interesting. The former’s layering of the oneric and political is what makes the film as effective as it is while the latter’s is some of the most propulsive (especially during the kinetic action scenes) of the year.

In addition, Yorgos Mavropsaridis’s work on Kinds of Kindness (a film which seems to have missed awards hype all together), should be commended as it strikes the perfect balance between the aspects of its tryptich plotting and within each of the sections independently. Anthology films are always hard to pull off and such wonderful balancing between the stories such as to preserve a throughline is rare.

CINEMATOGRAPHY

FILMDIRECTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHY
The BrutalistLol Crawley
Dune: Part TwoGreig Fraser
Emilia PérezPaul Guilhaume
MariaEdward Lachman
NosferatuJarin Blaschke

This is a category which is absolutely brimming with quality, and sans Emilia Pérez, is one where any of the winners are worthy due to the depth and beauty of their images.

Crawley’s work on The Brutalist helps the film ooze texture, and moments involving shadows hearken back to some of the best examples in the medium à la Gordon Willis’s work on The Godfather films.

Fraser’s work is just as good as his efforts on Dune and helps keep the two parts visually consistent with one another, affirming their status as complements telling one overarching story.

Lachman’s partnership with Pablo Larrain and Blaschke’s partnernship with Robert Eggers earns both cinematoraphers an additional well-earned nomition for their respective works. Blaschke’s accomplishments in rendering a near grey-scale image inspite of containing colors makes his work my personal pick for the award.

In terms of non-nominated works: Eric K. Yue’s work on I Saw the TV glow
keeps the film’s metaphysically dubious nature constantly prevalent as the lights and textures make it impossible for us to great a complete grasp on the reality of what’s transpiring; Sayombhu Mukdeeprom’s work on Queer imbues the dreamscape with a lush haze that keeps the viewer fully engrossed even as the scenario gets increasingly surreal; Benjamin Kračun’s work on The Substance gives it an precise, clinical tactility that serves as the perfect backdrop to both the conspiratorial and gore-filled tendencies of the film; Simon Duggan’s work on Furiosa: A A Mad Max Saga which brings a new life to Miller’s fantastic wasteland and serves as a worthy follow-up while not directly aping John Seale’s stellar work in Mad Max: Fury Road.

That all said, I think that its Lol Crawley‘s work on The Brutalist that will MOST LIKELY take home top prize. It should appeal to traditionalist voters and more conventional ones with both its subtle close-ups and magnificent wides.

PRODUCTION DESIGN

FILMNOMINEES
The BrutalistProduction Design: Judy Becker; Set Decoration: Patricia Cuccia
ConclaveProduction Design: Suzie Davies; Set Decoration: Cynthia Sleiter
Dune: Part TwoProduction Design: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Shane Vieau
NosferatuProduction Design: Craig Lathrop; Set Decoration: Beatrice Brentnerová
WickedProduction Design: Nathan Crowley; Set Decoration: Lee Sandales


While my personal pick of these would likely go to the team behind Nosferatu for the wonderful creation of a gothic hellscape that oozes its shadows at every corners, I think Academy voters will MOST LIKELY be swayed by Wicked and its fantastical renditions of Oz which the dance-numbers certainly call attention to. This is also the “populist” pick amongst the voters and seems like one of the “consolation” awards of sorts given to Wicked due to its widespread Blockbuster appeal.

VISUAL EFFECTS

FILMNOMINEES
Alien: RomulusEric Barba, Nelson Sepulveda-Fauser, Daniel Macarin, and Shane Mahan
Better ManLuke Millar, David Clayton, Keith Herft, and Peter Stubbs
Dune: Part TwoPaul Lambert, Stephen James, Rhys Salcombe, and Gerd Nefzer
Kingdom of the Planet of the ApesErik Winquist, Stephen Unterfranz, Paul Story, and Rodney Burke
WickedPablo Helman, Jonathan Fawkner, David Shirk, and Paul Corbould

While I think this batch of nominees is more than deserving of their selections (some more than others), the team behind Alex Garland’s Civil War deserves praise for the manner in which it transposes visions of violence onto the United States’ landscape in a viscerally upsetting, hauntingly grounded manner.

Yet, in spite of quality work on the part of the other candidates, this award is MOST LIKELY Dune: Part Two’s for the taking and it would be shocking if this was not the case. Helping to ground a wholly science-fiction world with this level of fidelity cannot be ignored.

COSTUME DESIGN

FILMNOMINEES
A Complete UnknownJacqueline Durran
ConclaveJacqueline West
Gladiator IIJanty Yates and Dave Crossman
NosferatuEllen Mirojnick
WickedHolly Waddington

As is the story for the Production Design award, I think Academy voters will MOST LIKELY be swayed by Holly Waddington’s work Wicked and the whimsical manner in which she brings to life the world of Oz’s characters.

My personal pick amongst the nominees would be Ellen Mirojnick’s work in Nosferatu. She ensures that the milieu of Egger’s gothic nightmare is historically grounded which allows the fantastical elements to stand-out in sharp, disturbing contrast. The work isn’t particularly showy, but is perfectly complimentary.

MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING

FILMNOMINEES
A Different ManMike Marino, David Presto, and Crystal Jurado
Emilia PérezJulia Floch Carbonel, Emmanuel Janvier, and Jean-Christophe Spadaccini
NosferatuDavid White, Traci Loader, and Suzanne Stokes-Munton
The SubstancePierre-Olivier Persin, Stéphanie Guillon, and Marilyne Scarselli
WickedFrances Hannon, Laura Blount, and Sarah Nuth

This award will MOST LIKELY go to Pierre-Olivier Persin, Stéphanie Guillon, and Marilyne Scarselli for their work on The Substance and deservedly so at that for the gonzo and astounding transformations character(s) go through. The committment to intertwining the stylings of the character with the visual effects makes the pronouncements of the former all the harder to ignore in spite of the genre bias the Academy has against horror. This is the film doing the most the best.

WRITING (ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY)

FILMWRITER(S)
AnoraSean Baker
The BrutalistBrady Corbet and Mona Fastvold
A Real PainJesse Eisenberg
September 5Moritz Binder and Tim Fehlbaum; co-written by Alex David
The SubstanceCoralie Fargeat

The omission of Justin Kuritzkes work on Challengers is baffling given the films intense plotting and exuberant tit-a-tats between its leading triumvirate. This is the kind of screenplay it feels the Academy would’ve lapped up in years past making its omission amongst this years’s nominees all the more apparent. Alex Garland’s work on Civil War should also be mentioned as he creates a world filled with implications, hidden within the dialogue and story beats, that informs the harrowing nature of its journey from start to finish without overdetermining it.

Out of the nominees, both A Real Pain and September 5 are films that live-or-die based on their scripts and it is their scripts that make the films as good as they are, yet neither are particularly “special” in a way that marks them as something more than well-written and efficient. They’re missing that critical “X” factor which would differentiate them enough.

There is a world where Brady Corbet and Mona Fastvold’s work on The Brutalist is given its “flowers”, but given the lack of voter interest in watching the film in its entirety [1]Davis, C. (2025, January 18). Oscar voting closes: Is “the Brutalist” underseen? could “juror #2” make a surprise best picture nom? – nine takeaways from Academy members. Variety. … Continue reading and the condemnation of the ambiguity and plotting in the second of the film, this would be a tougher sell ,even if it is my personal pick for the award.

While Fargeat’s script is nearly air-tight, I believe that voters will associate The Substance moreso with its gonzo visual designs and performances opposed to the masterful plotting of the narrative or the sardonic dialogue beats and will skip over commending it here.

Therefore, I believe that Sean Baker is MOST LIKELY to win for his work on Anora. He manages to achieve yet another indelibaly written screenplay with lived-in characters, quotable dialogue, and memorable scenes without missing those silent, poignant moments which serve as truly transcendent. His script is one which strikes a balance that should appeal to the most voters.

WRITING (ADAPTED SCREENPLAY)

FILMWRITER(S)
A Complete UnknownJames Mangold and Jay Cocks
ConclavePeter Straughan
Emilia PérezJacques Audiard
Nickel BoysRaMell Ross and Joslyn Barnes
Sing SingGreg Kwedar and Clint Bentley

Dune: Part Two is the glaring omission here, but that seems to be the story of this 95th Oscars. It should be reiterated the enormity of taking Frank Herbert’s seminal work and rendering it into a cinematically digestible work, let alone one which thumps with grandeur as this one does.

Kuritzkes work on Queer also needs to be mentioned. Taking William S. Burroughs work to task in screenplay form is an thankless, near impossible task, but Kuritzkes managed to do the same without missing out on the emotional beats which make the surreal, hallucinatory film accessible to those willing to let it penetrate.

Finally, Paul Schrader’s work in bringing Russell Banks’ Forgeone to the screen in the form of Oh, Canada warrants a mention if for nothing else than the unique sincerity of its emotional thrust; there has never been such a somber meditation on the meaning of art from an artist at death’s door and coming from Schrader, one of the form’s most underrated auteurs, its poignancy rings all the clearer.

Amongst the candidates themselves, I would pick RaMell Ross and Joslyn Barne’s work on Nickel Boys for the way in which they weave together their larger-than-life narrative through the eyes of two men, retaining a humanity while commenting on larger strucutral issues.


Yet, I believe that Peter Straughan will MOST LIKELY take home this prize for his work on Conclave. His script balances the urgency, mystery, and spiritual stakes of the film without compromising on any of those aspects and should have the most widespread appeal amongst the voters.

SOUND

FILMNOMINEES
A Complete UnknownTod A. Maitland, Donald Sylvester, Ted Caplan, Paul Massey, and David Giammarco
Dune: Part TwoGareth John, Richard King, Ron Bartlett, and Doug Hemphill
Emilia PérezErwan Kerzanet, Aymeric Devoldère, Maxence Dussère, Cyril Holtz, and Niels Barletta
WickedSimon Hayes, Nancy Nugent Title, Jack Dolman, Andy Nelson, and John Marquis
The Wild RobotRandy Thom, Brian Chumney, Gary A. Rizzo, and Leff Lefferts


Gareth John, Richard King, Ron Bartlett, and Doug Hemphills work on Dune: Part Two will MOST LIKELY win, especially due to the lack of particularly standout work from any of the other candidates.

Yet, it is the work of those responisble for Nosferatu’s soundscape that is glaringly missing. The crunchy, off-putting dissonances of the film were certainly the most visceral pieces of mixing I’ve heard in any film of the year and made the experience what it was.

MUSIC (ORIGINAL SCORE)

FILMCOMPOSERS
The BrutalistDaniel Blumberg
ConclaveVolker Bertelmann
Emilia PérezClément Ducol and Camille
WickedJohn Powell and Stephen Schwartz
The Wild RobotKris Bowers

There is Daniel Blumberg’s work on The Brutalist and then the other candidates. His work makes the film thump and pound as it does, as he expertely layers his sounds to bleed the diegetic and non-diegetic elements of the soundscape. His triumphant score sets the tone for the film and its transformation throughout serves to formally align and juxtapose the films’ competing elements.

Even those who may not enjoy the film cannot help but be swept away by the operatic, grandiose quality of the score. Therefore, I believe that Daniel Blumberg is MOST LIKELY to win.

Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’s work on both Challengers and Queer have been notibly omitted in spite of their vastly distinctive, yet equally evocatives dressing of their respective films. Neither of Guadagnino’s films are what they are without these aural textures, but given the exclusion of both of these works from any of the categories, it’s no surprise that the aural accoutrements of the works would get any recognition.

In addition, Kensuke Ushio’s work on The Colors Within is frustratingly missing in spite of the film’s explicit focus on music and the creation process that goes into the art-form. This is a score which features wonderful uses of the theremin amongst other instruments and its exclusion owes to The Academy’s general retience to acknowledge animated works outside of their animated qualities.

Finally, Robin Carolan’s operatic work on Nosferatu needs to be mentioned. The grandiose gothic leanings of the score transforms the represesed, dark vestiges it traverses into pockets of catharsis and generates beauty from the nightmarish.

MUSIC (ORIGINAL SONG)

SONGFILMNOMINEES
El MalEmilia PérezMusic by Clément Ducol and Camille; lyrics by Clément Ducol, Camille, and Jacques Audiard
The JourneyThe Six Triple EightMusic and lyrics by Diane Warren
Like a BirdSing SingMusic and lyrics by Abraham Alexander and Adrian Quesada
Mi CaminoEmilia PérezMusic and lyrics by Camille and Clément Ducol
Never Too LateElton John: Never Too LateMusic and lyrics by Elton John, Brandi Carlile, Andrew Watt, and Bernie Taupin

El Mal will MOST LIKELY win the award and of the Emilia Pérez nominations this is certainly the one that I can get behind. The song is wonderfully choregraphed, featuring an absoltuely electric Zoe Saldaña who nails delivering the song with such finesse alongside with the electric camera movements that one can’t help but get into the rythm of the song as its use within its context.

ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE

FILMACTOR
The BrutalistAdrien Brody
A Complete UnknownTimothée Chalamet
Sing SingColman Domingo
ConclaveRalph Fiennes
The ApprenticeSebastian Stan

This is a race between Adrien Brody and Timothée Chalamet but I still believe that the former is MOST LIKELY to win the award due to his success at ceremonies during awards season.

However, the biggest omission from the performances is from Timothée Chalamet’s work in Dune: Part Two, which I think is a step above nominated work (which is absolutely wonderful). His range and transformation in Villeneuve’s work is absolutely transfixing.

Additionally, Justice Smith’s performance in I Saw the TV Glow is riveting and his calm, awkward, often self-abasing performance is filled with nuance and depth, sublmiating the film’s themes into facial expressions and physical ticks that devastate.

Gaudagnino’s leading men are also noticeably missing from recognition: Mike Faist absolutely serves in Challengers oscillating between competitive, hurt, horny, and complacent whenever the film needs; Daniel Craig’s somber longing makes Queer as melancholic and wistful as it is and showcases a depth which hasn’t been prevalent in his work up to this point.

ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

FILMACTOR
AnoraYura Borisov
A Real PainKieran Culkin
A Complete UnknownEdward Norton
The BrutalistGuy Pearce
The ApprenticeJeremy Strong

Given his absolute decimation of this category throughout the season’s award shows, it’s not a MOST LIKELY as much as it is an inevitability that Kieran Culkin will win the award for his emotionally compelling work in A Real Pain.

However, it is Guy Pearce’s performance in The Brutalist which should win. It is an immense performance filled with nuances that elude surface level analysis and his ability to go toe-to-toe with Brody’s lead performance is what makes The Brutalist as engrossing and devastating as it is.

Aaron-Taylor Johnson and Willem DaFoe’s performances in Nosferatu are notable omissions as the two men who play counter-roles in the context of their characters relation to the supernatural nature of the plot give it the depth it needs to be as resonant.

ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

FILMACTRESS
WickedCynthia Erivo
Emilia PérezKarla Sofía Gascón
AnoraMikey Madison
The SubstanceDemi Moore
I’m Still HereFernanda Torres

This is a race between Mikey Madison and Demi Moore and while I would personally tip my hat more to Madison, especially due to The Substance’s reliance on a balancing act between Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley, the momentum is fully behind Moore who I believe is MOST LIKELY to win the award.

However, the inclusion of Demi Moore’s work in a genre film makes the omission Lily-Rose Depp’s performance in Nosferatu all the more troubling. Depp goes into full hystrionics in a way that is incredibly dificult to pull-off without coming off as caricature and she is the heart and soul of Eggers’ dark masterpiece.

Additionally, Kristen Dunst needs to be mentioned for her emotionally vulnerable, subtle transformative work in Civil War. Her arc is that of the film and is the necesary feature which lets the ending hit with the intensity by which it does.

Finally, Maika Monroe’s performance in Longlegs needs to be noted. Her quiet, socially-awkward cuts new ground in the genre and serves as the perfect vehicle for the audience to delve into the darker underpinnings of the world the film examines.

ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

FILMACTRESS
A Complete UnknownMonica Barbaro
WickedAriana Grande
The BrutalistFelicity Jones
ConclaveIsabella Rosselini
Emilia PérezZoe Saldaña

Given her absolute decimation of this category throughout the season’s award shows, it’s not a MOST LIKELY as much as it is an inevitability that Zoe Saldaña will win the award for her emotionally compelling work in The Holdovers.

However, it is Felicity Jones’ performance in The Brutalist which would be my personal choice as her appearance in the film triggers the dominos that make its conlcuding moments as poignant and cathartic as they are. Her show-stopping scene near the film’s end is utterly mesmerizing and is the best bit of acting amongst all the nominated performances.

Marget Qualley’s performance in The Substance is the biggest omission and one that has baffled me since the start of the Awards Show season given how much her balancing act with Demi Moore makes the film. Focusing on one performance over the other feels antiethical to the point the film makes which makes the lack of praise for one actress and the overwhelming support for the other absolutely puzzling. If Moore deserves her kudos(which she does), then Qualley deserves the same equally so.

Film Review: The Brutalist – 2024

Director(s)Brady Corbet
Principal CastAdrien Brody as László Tóth
Guy Pearce as Harrison Lee Van Buren
Felicity Jones as Erzsébet Tóth
Release Date2024
Language(s)English
Running Time 202 minutes
Report Card Click to go to Review TLDR/Summary

Note: This review was done off of theatrical viewings of the film and as such the review does not feature images or extended granular analysis. Once I am able to get a physical copy of the movie to watch, pause, analyze, and get stills from, the review will be updated to match the site’s standard review format.

A black screen, the ringing sound of sirens, then the text: Overture.

Just as he did in his previous two films, director Brady Corbet makes us formally aware that a thesis will be presented.

Glorious horns break in before the overture disappears and the sound of a shrieking woman pierces through the soundscape, shattering the grandiose aura.

A woman (Raffey Cassidy) is sat down and interrogated. She is tasked with explaining her family’s genealogy, give proof of her existence as a legible subject of the social order She remains silent and stares at the screen, forcing us into the position of interrogator struggling to make meaning of a gaze that avoids explanation.

Then, a cut: a new character, a new setting.

A man (Adrien Brody) tumbles around a boat and the chaotic sounds of the ship begin to overlay with the musicality of the overture; the line between that which is diegetic and that which is not blurs.

A woman’s voice layers over this sonic tapestry, reading from a letter. From her words we know that she is this man’s wife. She explains that she’s still alive and she is unable to come to him at the present. But her words are for us, not him – at least not yet.

He proceeds through the ship, bustling amongst the bodies on his journey to the deck. Finally, he reaches the outside.

The horns crescendos: Glory is here, hallelujah!

The camera turns and the Statue of Liberty occupies the frame; but this great symbol of American Freedom is presented upside down – a stark visual contrast to the booming of the horns and the presumed jubilation of the moment.

The man, László, beams with enthusiasm upon seeing this symbol of the American Dream, for unlike us, he sees the symbol as the powers that be intended it to be seen.

The woman’s speech ends: ” Go to America, I will follow you.”

Thus, the overture informs us of the deconstructive tendencies of the film, it’s desire to break-down that which it builds up:

  • The film opens on the image of a woman who refuses to answer that which she is asked while an unseen woman supplants the space the former’s voice would have occupied; visual and auditory presence is exchanged along the register of gender.
  • The triumphant score and narrative milieu immediately call the aesthetic of the Great American Novel caught on film but the image of Liberty rendered against itself calls the foundations of this image into question. The promise of freedom has been flipped on its head.
  • The formal bracketing of the women announcing and auguring the film’s subject, a man on a journey towards the dream, immediately invites question on the construction of narrative, both of the individual and of the statecraft.

From the outset, we are forced to decipher a labyrinth of symbols and associations wherein even seemingly simple exposition becomes something else totally.

New text materializes: Part 1: The Enigma of Arrival.

László gets off the ship and stands amongst the immigrants aboard the ship. An official gives the group instructions in English as a translator repeats the same information in another language; the two dialects overlay onto each other, confusing the presentation of the information even though the content of the utterances remain the same: difference materialized through the act of translation – the enigma of arrival, indeed.

Yet, despite possessing little income and being advised to be wary one’s use of their capital, László’s first free act off the boat is to find the nearest prostitute to avail himself of his wares. The lingering admission of love enunciated earlier to us as voice-over serves as stinging rejoinder to this seeming betrayal; we feel for this unseen woman and chastise our protagonist despite his lack of knowledge; dramatic irony is thus rendered a formal conceit, a function of exposition that creates distance from context.

But try as he may, László is unable to fully consummate his tryst, a failure which leads the brothel’s owner to suggest that his sexual proclivities may not fall within the heteronormative paradigms of the time. She suggests men. He rejects her repeated suggestions with an air of disdain, a repudiation which operates both to show us László’s reticence to being categorized, in this case as queer, and as a comment about the contours of sexuality, the manner in which masculine sexual inclination is positioned in particular.

As László acclimates to his new home, Corbet intersperses radio broadcasts about the domestic and foreign affairs at the time alongside historically-tinted propaganda video sections extolling American virtues (presented in a boxier video-format), constantly complicating our relationship to the information being presented. The assertion of fact in these proclamations trains us to be suspect of the relationship between enunciation and verisimilitude

The narrative proper which features scenes upon scenes of our primary characters explicitly asserting themselves become doubled due to this inculcation, and the dread of what is not said, the visible absence so to speak, continues to build critical mass against the apparent didactic being employed until its provocations threaten to expose the artifice of the film all together.

In this vein, The Brutalist operates in a dialect with itself through its Rorschach-like formal tactility. On the surface, the film contains all the trappings of the Great American Novel:

  • The story follows a rags-to-riches redemption story emblematic of the American Dream: László is a Holocaust survivor who is given a chance to continue his architectural genius under the purview of a new patron (Guy Ritchie)
  • Composer Daniel Blumberg’s mostly momentous score emphasizes the epic stature of the tale.
  • The formal demarcations of the film accentuate its novelistic quality, operating like chapters.

Yet, where the film shines is not the content of the narrative per-se as much as the structure by which it is presented. When the story as presented is viewed as veneer to be peeled back, the film transforms into a ghost story, one in which the myth of the epic assemblage haunts the story as a specter, both within the narrative proper (ex: diegetic and chronological ellipses) and around the narrative in the non-diegetic features.

By using the trappings of the Great American Novel, Corbet is able to toe the line between serious drama and deconstructive pastiche that his previous works have been unable to broach as successfully. Because we are aware generally of where László’s journey should go given our familiarity with the milieu, we are more perturbed by disturbances to that rhythm, a facet that the polarizing 2nd Part of the film exploits to full effect; when the film “cheats” and gets to the next preordained spot on our expected journey, we’re left to reckon with the through-line motivating the transition between the points without the usual journey which would explicate as much; when the film “breaks” with the structure and introduces a pivot that is seemingly out-of-place, we’re left recoiling with deducing what more commonplace moment has been replaced.

In either case, we are forced to use the film against itself, utilizing its ambiguities to mine into one another to craft a structure of meaning that can serve to scaffold the verifiable aspects of the film. This provocation is made explicit by the story, as László’s brutalist architecture, his artistic contribution, is constantly being symbolized, discussed, interpellated. We can’t help but caught up in analyzing the film’s grammar when the film centers itself around the same activity.

Ultimately, it is this act of interpretation, a brutality representing the most fundamental form of violence, that the film circulates around. The title then, a reference to both violence and art, is a confirmation of the intimate relationship between the two concepts and the manner in which the former both allows and enshrines the latter.

REPORT CARD

TLDRThe Brutalist sees the Great American novel rendered undo itself, operating as both a more traditional character-focused epic following a protagonist struggling to achieve the American Dream whilst deconstructing the meaning of that Dream and the ideological consequences of its deployment, presenting its findings as a Rorschach test that will give viewers as much as they put in.
Rating10/10
Grade S+

Go to Page 2 for the spoiler discussion and more in-depth analysis.
Go to Page 3 to view this review’s progress report .

2025 – Top 10 Most Anticipated Films

With the new year officially upon us, here are the 10 films I am most excited for (based on projected release dates).

My list is certainly auteur driven and is less focused on the subject matter of the films themselves. The best filmmakers usually make the best films and my picks reflect my taste among auteurs and the quality of their works leading up to the film in question.

10. Nouvelle Vague by Richard Linklater

Linklater’s 2020’s output has been consistent with both Apollo 10 1⁄2: A Space Age Childhood and Hit Man serving as solid additions to the director’s oeuvre, so Nouvelle Vague would have been something to keep my ears out for anyways; but in the past few years I’ve come to genuinely enjoy the French New Wave’s importance and relevance within the history of film. In particular, I have found myself circling the behemoth that is Godard’s filmography.

The idea of Linklater tackling the milieu and genesis of Godard’s Breathless at that sounds too exciting a prospect to miss out on.

Additionally, Linklater has always been an excavator of dialogue and an surveyor of chronology, so seeing his take on one of cinema’s great linguists (both in the spoken word and film grammar), Godard, in a wholly different language, French opposed to English, at the moment when Godard would change the schema of cinema entirely with his groundbreaking debut film, sounds like it has all the parts that could let Linklater truly let loose in a way his past few entries haven’t allowed.

9. Hope by Na Hong Jin

While Na’s first two features are remarkable, it is his 2016 foray into horror with his feature The Wailing which put him on my radar and made his next film an immediate must-see.

The Wailing is one of the densest, most intricately written and woven horror films of the 21st century and deserves comparisons to the best. Fans were able to partially whet their appetite for a Na with his screenplay contributions to 2021’s The Medium, but nothing can substitute the feeling of watching his direction proper. Here’s to hoping that the long gestation period will deliver.

8. Mickey 17 by Bong Joon-Ho

This has been the longest period between films for the prolific auteur from South Korea made all the more curious given that his last film, 2019’s Parasite, was a critical and commercial darling. For me, it also stands as his finest (which is certainly a compliment when your filmography contains Memories of Murder), so my anticipation for this next work is palpable to say the least.

In addition, the pairing of Bong with Robert Pattinson, a star whose iconic performances in multiple arthouse hits (Good Time, The Lighthouse) and outings in bigger blockbusters ( Tenet, The Batman) have demonstrated his versatility and depth, is exciting to imagine (especially after hearing that voice in the trailer).

Additionally, as a huge fan of his last fully English science-fiction feature, Snowpiercer, the subject matter and change in language feel like they could allow Bong to do something spectacular once more.

Fingers crossed that this does not get delayed again.

7. Resurrection by Bi Gan

Few modern filmmakers have treaded into the liminal space between reality and dream in such ethereal fashion as Bi has in recent years. His 2018 film Long Day’s Journey Into the Night and 2022 short A Short Story demonstrated his unique voice and ability to set a slow and dreamy tone like few others in the artform and certainly feels like its descended from a lineage including Andrei Tarkovsky and Apichatpong Weerasethakul – good company to say the least.

Resurrection’s synopsis mentions dreams, being lost in time, and androids – all markers which augur well for a Bi film (and remind me quite a lot of Wong Kar-wai’s 2046 which makes me all the more excited).

6. Orphan by László Nemes

With one of the best debuts of the 21st century in 2016’s Son of Saul and his nearly equally triumphant second feature in 2018’s Sunset, Nemes has marked himself as a director to pay special attention to. He is daring formalist whose sheer dedication to carving out an aesthetic from the sublime and terrible makes his moving images immediately captivating.

The moment I saw he was doing another film in an oppressive historical milieu, my interest was piqued. It’s always a pleasure to see a master crafter doing what they do best.

5. The Phoenician Scheme by Wes Anderson

Any Wes Anderson film is an event to be marked, and with his dogged formal commitment and evolution in the 2020’s present in his features The French Dispatch and Asteroid City along with his series of Roald Dahl shorts/anthology film, the anticipation for his next film is all the greater.

The French Dispatch saw him playing with his commitment to breaking apart stories at a formal level while Asteroid City and his anthology work showed him using his style in an increasingly aware style that makes the incredible artifice of his work even more layered. As a fan of Wes Anderson’s pictorial beauty and melancholic narrative sensibilities, it’s his formal work that most excites me now.

This is very much an auteur still finding the limits and thresholds of his particular style, one whose nuance in expression has become even more poignant with his most recent offerings. Here’s hoping that his latest continues the trend.

4. Die My Love by Lynne Ramsay

Ramsay’s oeuvre is certifiable proof that quantity is not quality as her four features over multiple decades comprise a filmography that could go pound-for-pound with many of the forms greatest. No one else is able to quite capture the way characters are ensnared, molded, and react to traumatic wastelands with such poetic brevity. There is a texture in her films that is immediately apparent and eludes textual description; she’s a filmmaker whose works can only be experienced because the narrative, so to speak, hangs off the image like a drape on windows, accentuating but never overdetermining.

With a cast that features Jennifer Lawrence in the lead and multiple surrounding stars (including Robert Pattinson, Sissy Spacek, and LaKeith Stanfield) and a genre, horror-comedy, that her work has played with more tangentially, it seems like we’re in for yet another indelible cinematic offering.

3. One Battle After Another by Paul Thomas Anderson

There is a good argument that Paul Thomas Anderson is the greatest working director and many of his 21st century works (including There Will Be Blood, The Master, Punch Drunk Love) are in contention for the best #1 position on many “Best Of” lists.

His latest feature marks his first collaboration with Leonardo DiCaprio, who likewise has a similar argument for being the finest working actor in the modern era and some of his finest performances (Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, The Revenant) come from the last decade.

Any collaboration between stars is one to to keep ones eyes out for, but a collaboration between two superstars in their respective artforms is a whole other deal. Given the budget and IMAX screenings the film received, it will be a beast to behold regardless of whether or not it reaches PTA’s peaks.

In any other year, this would easily be my number one pick, but due to both nature of personal biases it slots in at three.

2. Eddington by Ari Aster

Ari Aster is my favorite director out of all the most recent auteurs. His works are the ones I have found myself most entranced by and I find myself returning to them to mine their formal conceits again and again. His current run of Hereditary, Midsommar, and Beau is Afraid is truly a behemoth to witness in real-time.

He’s a true formalist with a gift for directing actors and Beau demonstrates his willingness to push the limits of maximalist storytelling in ways that are wholly original and engrossing.

Eddington sees him working once again with Joaquin Phoenix (whose work in Beau is certainly some of his and 2023’s best) and Emma Stone (who is coming off a hot-streak from her collaborations with Yorgos Lanthimos) along with Austin Butler (whose transformations in both Elvis and Dune: Part Two have certainly made him someone to watch for).

But interestingly enough, this also marks his first feature apart from his longtime cinematographer Pawel Pogorzelski. Instead, Eddington will be lensed by legendary DP Darius Khondji (who coincidentally also lensed Mickey 17). It’ll be curious to see how Aster’s visual language changes (or stays the same) as a result.

If anything, seeing him tackle the Western with his patented black humor and absurdist horrific tendencies with this cast will be a treat.

1. No Other Choice by Park Chan-wook

Park is one of the great masters of the art-form. Full stop.

He’s made multiple masterpieces in multiple decades and his most recent 2022 film, Decision to Leave, is proof that he is still at the top of his game.

No Other Choice has been a long gestating film for him for developed over years and is one he has described as wanting to make as his “masterpiece.”

When an artist of this caliber and consistency announces their passion project, you best be ready.

Halloween 2024: 31 Day Horror Marathon

Welcome to the Critic’s Sanctum’s 6th Annual 31-Day Horror Marathon!

With Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu on the horizon this Christmas, a remake of one of the most (if not the outright the most) famous vampire films to grace the big screen, I thought it fitting to explore the vampire sub-genre through history and the manner in which the creature has both been mythologized and deployed.

The initial entries present unique visions of the vampire from the earlier ages of the cinematic medium. These films form the template that a large host of the sub-genre has lifted from since.

After this introduction, the entries focus on re-articulations of these classic tales. These films are attempts at either differently representing the origin stories or hyper focusing on certain aspects to exaggerate a feeling or set of themes.

With the figure of the vampire more clearly defined, we will move to an exploration of the monster and the manner in which it’s deployed in more traditional narratives that are less focused on articulating an origin story. Some of these entries are art-house leaning while others are more conventional in order to thoroughly examine the narrative potential the vampire opens up.

Finally, the marathon concludes with experimental explorations of the vampire. These films may or may not include “real” vampires as we’ve been accustomed to up to the point, but they do explore the vampire as a conceptual metaphor or conceit.

The List

DATEFILMDIRECTORYEARCOMMENTARY
10-1-2024Nosferatu F. W. Murnau1922
10-2-2024DraculaTodd Browning1931
10-3-2024VampyrCarl Theodor Dreyer1932
10-4-2024Nosferatu the VampyreWerner Herzog 1979
10-5-2024DraculaTerence Fisher1958
10-6-2024Bram Stoker’s Dracula Francis Ford Coppola 1992
10-7-2024Count DraculaJesús Franco1970
10-8-2024Vampyros LesbosJesús Franco1971
10-9-2024The Rape of the VampireJean Rollin1968
10-10-2024The Nude VampireJean Rollin1970
10-11-2024The Shiver of the VampiresJean Rollin1971
10-12-2024Black SundayMario Bava1960
10-13-2024The Fearless Vampire Killers Roman Polanski1967
10-14-2024Valerie and Her Week of Wonders Jaromil Jireš1970
10-15-2024Blood For DraculaPaul Morrissey1974
10-16-2024The HungerTony Scott1983
10-17-2024LifeforceTobe Hooper1985
10-18-2024Cronos Guillermo del Toro1992
10-20-2024Interview With a Vampire Neil Jordan1994
10-20-2024VampiresJohn Carpenter 1998
10-21-2024Let the Right One InTomas Alfredson2008
10-22-2024ThirstPark Chan-wook2009
10-23-2024TwixtFrancis Ford Coppola 2011
10-24-2024Only Lovers Left AliveJim Jarmusch2013
10-25-2024A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night Ana Lily Amirpour2014
10-26-2024Doctor SleepMike Flanagan2019
10-27-2024El CondePablo Larrain2023
10-28-2024Shadow of the VampireE. Elias Merhige2000
10-29-2024MartinGeorge Romero1977
10-30-2024ArrebatoIván Zulueta1979
10-31-2024Cuadecuc, vampirPere Portabella1970